Практические задания. I. Определите тип семантических отношений между составными частями в

I. Определите тип семантических отношений между составными частями в

следующих сложносочиненных предложениях.

1. Suddenly the door burst open, and a tall man was standing in a quite baggy

sweater.

2. You see there is nothing seriously wrong, she just gets a bit paranoid

sometimes.

3. I bent down when she got near and she put her arm round my neck and

pressed her little hot face against mine.

4. Jerome’s sensing his poems are ready, so I’m finding him book club venues.

5. Young Ladislaw did not feel like smiling, but she wore rather a pouting

air of discontent.

6. He does not hold a regular job, nor does he take odd jobs.

7. Either she goes or I go.

8. I don’t eat much, yet I am a size 16.

9. Formula One motor car racing is supposed to be dangerous, still “Indycar”

racing is supposed to be more dangerous.

10. She was free for five whole days, and so she would be going to Charles, to

join her family.

11. Martin helped his father dig the water gardens out by hand, thus he

discovered his interest in gardening.

12. The superadded circumstance evolving the genius had not yet come;

the universe had not yet beckoned.

13. Ben did not hear the answer, he felt himself fading again.

14. Mr. Casaubon’s words had not been quite reasonable, yet they had brought a

vague sense of aloofness on his part.

II. Проанализируйте структуру следующих осложненных предложений и

укажите, к какому типу они относятся.

1. She grabbed hold of my arm and changed direction back towards Cosmo,

only to be confronted by Mark and Rebecca.

2. “Mark”, said Constance sulkily, looking from side to side as if planning to

bolt.

3. The three of them made their good-byes, Mark and Elaine easing the admiral

out of the door.

4. Sharon and I have just got back to our hut to find our padlock open.

5. We all looked at each other, stunned at this strange act of the heavens.

6. Across the garden was Jude, radiant in turquoise, chatting to Magda.

7. Then I turned to see Mark Darcy walking away.

8. Giles went on and on about sending me a copy of Feel the Fear and Do It

Anyway.

9. Mark was at the head of the table, sitting between Rebecca and Louise

Barton-Foster and deep in conversation.

10. She still wanted me and Shaz to be bridesmaids.

III. Определите тип следующих осложненных предложений с

подчинением.

1. That ritual over, he was flown to Tbilisi for the second stage of

inauguration.

2. The other option is taking the metro to the station A.

3. The food is served in ceramic dishes manufactured at the local factory.

4. Being a pedestrian in Moscow is a dangerous thing now.

5. It is not uncommon to see them racing down sidewalks.

6. We wouldn’t dream of driving with a mobile in one hand and a Big Mac in

the other.

7. We could stop carving up the wildlife in the futile effort to accommodate

the endless traffic jams.

8. There would be the question of where to park all those horses in the center

of Moscow.

9. Disillusioned with the celebrity world, Rosy escapes to run a refugee camp

in the African desert.

10. She found many things strange here.

Литература

1. Блох М.Я. Теоретическая грамматика английского языка. – М., 2005.

2. Блох М.Я. Теоретические основы грамматики. – М., 2005.

3. Кобрина Н.А., Болдырев Н.Н., Худяков А.А. Теоретическая грамматика

современного английского языка. – М., 2007.

4. Жарких Е.Ю., Биренбаум Я.Г. О границе сложносочиненного и

сложноподчиненного предложения в // Предикативность и

полипредикативность. – Челябинск, 1987. – С.58-77.

5. Иванова И.П., Бурлакова В.В., Почепцов Г.Г. Теоретическая грамматика

современного английского языка. – М., 1981.

6. Иофик Л.Л. Сложное предложение в новоанглийском языке. – Л., 1968.

7. Петрова Т.А. Свернутые конструкции как тип сложных номинативных

единиц в современном англ. языке. Автореф. дисс. на соискание уч.

степени канд. филол.наук. Иркутск, 2004.

8. Плоткин В.Я. Строй английского языка. – М., 1989.

9. Системный анализ простого и сложного предложения: Межвузовский

сборник научных трудов. – Ленинград, 1990.

10. Структура и семантика простого, сложного и осложненного предложения:

Межвузовский сборник научных трудов. – Ленинград, 1988.

11. Черемисина М.И. Сложное предложение как объект общего языкознания//

Предикативность и полипредикативность. – Челябинск, 1987. – С. 5-19.

12. Шалифова О.Н. Структурно-семантические типы придаточных

определительных в английском языке// Вестник факультета иностранных

языков. – Сам ГПУ, 2002, №3, стр. 51-57.

13. Литвин Ф.А. О степенях предикативности// Филологические Науки, 1984,

№ 4.

14. Серкина О.В. Функционально-семантический аспект рассмотрения

абсолютной конструкции в современном англ. языке. Автореф. дисс. на

соискание уч. степени канд. филол. наук.

15. Снитко Т.Н. Критерии предикативности для типологии языков//

Предикативность и полипредикативность. – Челябинск, 1987. – С.41-58.

ТЕМА 7