![]() |
Главная Случайная страница Контакты | Мы поможем в написании вашей работы! | |
|
There are many ethical issues in sociological research. Perhaps the most controversial concerns the scientist's right to research and the subjects' rights to dignity, self-determination, and privacy. For Edward Shils, a leading sociologist, all social science must be disciplined by meticulous attention to the problem of privacy. He would rule out any "observations of private behaviour, however technically feasible, without the explicit and fully informed permission of the person to be observed."
Few would deny that social scientists can go too far in intruding on privacy. Can sociologists avoid encroaching on the rights of individuals and organizations? Following Shils, at least in principle, if all the conditions of informed consent – full information, a fair explanation and description of the methods, goals, benefits, and possible risks to subjects – have been fulfilled, then researchers may feel confident that the well-being of their subjects has been given satisfactory consideration.
But there are other questions not covered by the recommendations just listed. When research is sponsored by government agencies, for example, what are the investigators' responsibilities concerning how it is used? Must researchers worry about how special interests use or distort their findings? Or, if sociologists uncover illegal practices when they study an organization, do they have a social duty to report the matter? Sociologists must also be wary of cooptation when they work for the government as well as private organizations; it is difficult to resist assuming, over time, the viewpoint of their employers and grantors, or to deny permission for their research to be used to provide a scientific "gloss" for whatever policies an organization wishes to implement. Too often sociologists as well as other researchers have been manipulated into endorsing the policy of an organization that employs them.
Researchers must assume the responsibility for deciding when they have crossed beyond the bounds of ethics. To illustrate the issues sociologists must confront, let us consider the question of deception. In his observation of homosexual activities in a public restroom, researcher Laud Humphries kept the identity of the participants secret but did not make clear to them at the time that they were subjects in a sociological study. Obviously, had he done so, it is doubtful that any assurances of anonymity could have persuaded them to cooperate. The real ethical issue in that research is not so much whether the researcher was justified in not disclosing his purpose but whether this deliberate deception was itself morally proper.
In order to gain entry into the scene, Humphries posed as a "watchqueen" – a voyeur and lookout. Further, the researcher infringed upon their right to privacy. Most of the subjects did not want their sexual activities known and probably would have refused to participate in a research study. One commentator on such research ploys has observed that had the researcher been unable to keep secret the identities of his subjects, their careers could have been ruined, their families disrupted, and their mental health impaired. Quite apart from giving sociology a bad name, the use of deception in field work poisons the atmosphere of all social science research.
Дата публикования: 2015-09-18; Прочитано: 210 | Нарушение авторского права страницы | Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!